Abstract

The understanding of modern working methods in the social work of churches - "diaconia" - has its roots in the examples set by the Early Church. The present study examines how well Paul Philippi was able to argue for this thesis. The findings in this article show that Philippi's position about the character of "Diaconia" is not exactly the same as the traditional point of view. He does not point out the very basic tasks of the deacons in the field of social-caritative activity, but builds on a large scale cooperation between a bishop and his deacon. The way Philippi describes the parish life, the functions of members other than deacons and the common responsibility to each other among Christians were all quite well documented. The role of women had some issues, but not many. The erroneous references concentrate on the duties of a deacon. While according to Philippi, the main occupation of the deacons was social care, he is trying to make deacons caritative but cannot present adequate textual sources for this idea. As a whole, we can note that some kind of a prejudiced view seems to have led the writer when he was writing about the duties of a deacon.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.