Abstract

Public health agencies around the world are concerned about an ever-increasing burden of type 2 diabetes and related disability. Access to primary care providers (PCPs) can support early diagnosis and management. However, there is limited literature on how frequently older people with diabetes access PCPs, and their levels of access in rural Australia relative to metropolitan areas. In this research, patterns of PCP use among those with diagnosed diabetes and those without diagnosed diabetes (referred to as 'healthy' individuals) were compared using a large survey of more than 230 000 people aged 45 years and older from New South Wales, Australia. A published model to study the PCP access patterns of a group of individuals with diabetes risk was used. Annual visits to PCPs among people aged 45 years or more with diabetes in rural areas, while higher than for healthy rural residents, were significantly lower than their metropolitan counterparts, mirroring similar disparities in PCP use across the rural-urban divide in the healthy population. Similar patterns were present in the high-risk population. Nevertheless, people with diabetes visited PCPs around four times a year, which is around the recommended number of annual visits, although some groups (eg those with comorbidities) may need more visits. Patterns of PCP use among rural residents, while significantly less frequent than their metropolitan counterparts, are at the recommended level for people with diabetes.

Highlights

  • August 2021 Volume 21 Issue 3Mazumdar S, Bagheri N, Chong S, McRae IS, Jalaludin B, Girosi F

  • Public health agencies around the world are concerned about an ever-increasing burden of type 2 diabetes and related disability

  • These survey data were linked by the Sax Institute using a unique Department of Human Services identifier to Medicare Benefits Schedule primary care providers (PCPs) administrative claims data and subset to a 6 month window before and after the survey date

Read more

Summary

August 2021 Volume 21 Issue 3

Mazumdar S, Bagheri N, Chong S, McRae IS, Jalaludin B, Girosi F.

Methods
Results
Ethics approval
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call