Abstract

Several studies show worse outcome for diabetic patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). There are relatively few studies evaluating outcome in the modern era of coronary stenting. We compared the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat target lesion revascularization (RTLR) by PTCA or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over a 6-month follow-up in 110 diabetic and 400 nondiabetic patients receiving Palmaz-Schatz stents. All patients received aspirin/ticlopidine and stents were deployed using high-pressure inflations. Seventy-five (68.2%) diabetic patients and 272 (68%) nondiabetic patients had single stents, while 35 (31.8%) diabetic and 128 (32%) nondiabetic patients had multiple stents (≥ 2stents in the same vessel). The success rate and acute major complications were not significantly different between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. There was also no significant difference in death, MI, and repeat PTCA between these two groups. Diabetic patients underwent CABG more frequently than nondiabetic patients (12.7% vs 3.2%, respectively, P =0.001) and diabetic patients also had RTLR more frequently than nondiabetic patients (25.5% vs 12.8%, respectively, P = 0.002) during 6-month follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes and multiple stents independently contributed to the 6-month RTLR rate. Coronary stenting in diabetic patients can be carried out with a high success rate and low incidence of acute major complications. The presence of diabetes mellitus and multiple stent placement significantly increase the incidence of repeat target lesion revascularization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.