Abstract

In this Viewpoint issues in the construction and use of adiabatic and diabatic representations in describing spin-conserving electronically nonadiabatic processes using the Born-Huang ansatz are reviewed and illustrated. We address issues which limit the accuracy of commonly used approximate equations of motion. The following caveats are discussed. (i) The use of adiabatic states for Nstate > 2 is complicated by the fact that if states (I, J) and (J, K) have conical intersections then the derivative coupling f(a),I,J(R) may well be double-valued, rendering it inappropriate for nuclear dynamics. (ii) In the nonadiabatic tunneling regime, nuclear motion can be restricted to a single adiabatic potential energy surface on the basis of total energy. However, energetically inaccessible conical intersections make it necessary to take into account the geometric phase and the induced vector potential when formulating the nuclear Schrödinger equation. We review how a diabatization approach which takes explicit account of the derivative couplings can be used to accurately include these factors. (iii) Finally, we review how a commonly used class of two-state diabatizations based on smooth molecular properties can be subject to ruinous singularities inherent in equations defining the diabatization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.