Abstract
The ground and excited state geometries of several red-emitting phosphors (N^N)(2)Os(P^P) [where N^N = 5-(1-isoquinolyl)-1,2,4-triazoles, P^P = bis(dimethylphosphino)methylene(dmpm) (1); P^P = cis-1,2-bis-(dimethylphosphino)ethene(dmpe) (2); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)benzene(dmpb) (3); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)naphthalene(dmpn) (4); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)-4-cyano-benzene(dmpcb) (5)] have been investigated by using the density functional theory (DFT) methods. The calculated results indicate that, for the studied complexes, the electron-transporting performance is better than the hole-transporting performance. The alteration of cis-P^P ancillary ligands with different conjugation lengths and substituents has an impact on the optoelectronic properties of these complexes, especially the electron-withdrawing group -CN in 5. The calculated energy gaps are nearly the same for complexes 1 to 4 (3.34 eV), while for 5, the HOMO and LUMO energies are lowered and the energy gap increases (3.42 eV). The absorption of 1 is red shifted, while that of 5 is blue shifted compared with the absorptions of 2, 3, and 4, which have similar absorptions. Complexes 2, 3, and 4 have almost identical emission wavelength 699 nm, while 1 (715 nm) and 5 (735 nm) are red shifted. The calculated electron affinities and reorganization energies indicate that complex 5 is the easiest for electron injection and has the best electron-transporting performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.