Abstract

AbstractThe isoprene/ethylene copolymerization catalyzed by cationic rare earth metal complexes [(η5‐C5Me5)Sc(CH2SiMe3)]+ (A) had afforded alternating isoprene‐ethylene copolymer with rich 3,4‐polyisoprene microstructures, whereas no isoprene‐ethylene copolymer was observed by using analogous [(PNPPh)Sc(CH2SiMe3)]+ (B) under the same conditions. Theoretical calculations in this work have revealed that, in the case of A, successive 3,4‐insertion of isoprene resulted in a noncovalent interaction between the C = C double bond of penultimate unit and the metal center, suppressing the further insertion of monomers due to higher energy barrier and endergonic character. On the other hand, the ethylene pre‐inserted species with alkyl active site is more suitable for the subsequent kinetically and thermodynamically favorable isoprene insertion and copolymerization is therefore realized. In the case of B, the experimentally observed cis‐1,4‐specific homopolymerization of isoprene was the outcome of both kinetic and thermodynamic control. And, the unfavorable ethylene insertion into the isoprene pre‐inserted species with allyl active site could account for the experimental finding that no isoprene‐ethylene copolymer was obtained. These computational results are expected to provide some hints for the design of rare earth copolymerization catalysts.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.