Abstract

The gas-phase thermal decomposition kinetics of silacyclobutane (1), 1-methyl- silacyclobutane (2), and 1,1-dimethyl-1-silacyclobutane (3) has been theoretically studied at the B3LYP/6-311G**, B3PW91/6-311G**, and MPW1PW91/6-311G** levels. The B3LYP/6-311G** method was found to give a reasonable good agreement with the experimental kinetics and thermodynamic parameters. The decomposition reaction of compounds 1–3 yields ethylene and the corresponding silene. Based on the optimized ground state geometries using B3LYP/6-311G** method, the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis of donor-acceptor (bonding–antibonding) interactions revealed that the perturbation energies (E2) associated with the electronic delocalization from σSi1–C2 to σ*C4–Si1 orbitals increase from compounds 1 to 3. The σSi1–C2→σ*C4–Si1 resonance energies for compounds 1–3 are 1.17, 1.26, and 1.43 kcal/mol, respectively. Also, the decomposition process in these compounds is controlled by σ→σ* resonance energies. Moreover, the obtained order of energy barriers could be explained by the number of electron-releasing methyl groups substituted to the Sisp2 atom. NBO analysis shows that the occupancies of σSi1–C2 bonds decrease for compounds 1–3 as 3 < 2 < 1, and the occupancies of σ*Si1–C2 bonds increase in the opposite order (3 > 2 > 1). Moreover, these results can fairly explain the decrease of the energy barriers (ΔEo) of the decomposition reaction of compounds 1 to 3. The calculated data demonstrate that in the decomposition process of the studied compounds, the polarization of the C3–C4 bond is the rate determining factor. Analysis of bond orders, NBO charges, bond indexes, synchronicity parameters, and IRC calculations indicate that these reactions are occurring through a concerted and asynchronous four-membered cyclic transition state type of mechanism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call