Abstract

Methylphenidate induces reanimation (active emergence) from general anesthesia in rodents, and recent evidence suggests that dopaminergic neurotransmission is important in producing this effect. Dextroamphetamine causes the direct release of dopamine and norepinephrine, whereas atomoxetine is a selective reuptake inhibitor for norepinephrine. Like methylphenidate, both drugs are prescribed to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. In this study, we tested the efficacy of dextroamphetamine and atomoxetine for inducing reanimation from general anesthesia in rats. Emergence from general anesthesia was defined by return of righting. During continuous sevoflurane anesthesia, dextroamphetamine dose-dependently induced behavioral arousal and restored righting, but atomoxetine did not (n = 6 each). When the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH-23390 was administered prior to dextroamphetamine under the same conditions, righting was not restored (n = 6). After a single dose of propofol (8 mg/kg IV), the mean emergence times for rats that received normal saline (vehicle) and dextroamphetamine (1 mg/kg IV) were 641 sec and 404 sec, respectively (n = 8 each). The difference was statistically significant. Although atomoxetine reduced mean emergence time to 566 sec (n = 8), this decrease was not statistically significant. Spectral analysis of electroencephalogram recordings revealed that dextroamphetamine and atomoxetine both induced a shift in peak power from δ (0.1–4 Hz) to θ (4–8 Hz) during continuous sevoflurane general anesthesia, which was not observed when animals were pre-treated with SCH-23390. In summary, dextroamphetamine induces reanimation from general anesthesia in rodents, but atomoxetine does not induce an arousal response under the same experimental conditions. This supports the hypothesis that dopaminergic stimulation during general anesthesia produces a robust behavioral arousal response. In contrast, selective noradrenergic stimulation causes significant neurophysiological changes, but does not promote behavioral arousal during general anesthesia. We hypothesize that dextroamphetamine is more likely than atomoxetine to be clinically useful for restoring consciousness in anesthetized patients, mainly due to its stimulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission.

Highlights

  • Patients recovering from general anesthesia can present significant clinical challenges including airway and oxygenation problems [1], emergence delirium [2, 3], cognitive dysfunction [4, 5], and delayed emergence [6]

  • General anesthesia is a reversible, drug-induced state comprised of unconsciousness, amnesia, analgesia, and immobility in the setting of hemodynamic stability [27]

  • The median alveolar concentration (MAC) of an inhaled anesthetic that produces immobility has been used to define anesthetic potency [28]. It was reported in the 1970s that amphetamine administration acutely increases MAC for halothane and cyclopropane in dogs [29,30,31], but unconsciousness is an anesthetic endpoint produced in the brain that is fundamentally distinct from immobility produced in the spinal cord

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients recovering from general anesthesia can present significant clinical challenges including airway and oxygenation problems [1], emergence delirium [2, 3], cognitive dysfunction [4, 5], and delayed emergence [6]. At the level of neural circuits, arousal-promoting cholinergic [8, 9], monoaminergic [10,11,12,13] and orexinergic [14,15,16] neurons have been implicated in anesthetic emergence, but their specific roles in restoring consciousness and cognitive function remain unclear. Methylphenidate induces active emergence, or reanimation, from general anesthesia in rodents [13, 17]. Intravenous administration of a D1 dopamine receptor agonist [20] as well as electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) [21] have been shown to induce reanimation in anesthetized rodents, suggesting that dopamine release by VTA neurons causes a profound arousal response sufficient to reverse the behavioral effects of general anesthesia. Less is known about the role of norepinephrine in reanimation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call