Abstract

BackgroundProcalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were previously shown to have value for the detection of secondary infections in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, since the introduction of immunomodulatory therapy, the value of these biomarkers is unclear. We investigated PCT and CRP kinetics in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone with or without tocilizumab, and assessed the value of these biomarkers to detect secondary bacterial infections.MethodsIn this prospective study, 190 critically ill COVID-19 patients were divided into three treatment groups: no dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D−T−), dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D+T−), and dexamethasone and tocilizumab (D+T+). Serial data of PCT and CRP were aligned on the last day of dexamethasone treatment, and kinetics of these biomarkers were analyzed between 6 days prior to cessation of dexamethasone and 10 days afterwards. Furthermore, the D+T− and D+T+ groups were subdivided into secondary infection and no-secondary infection groups to analyze differences in PCT and CRP kinetics and calculate detection accuracy of these biomarkers for the occurrence of a secondary infection.ResultsFollowing cessation of dexamethasone, there was a rebound in PCT and CRP levels, most pronounced in the D+T− group. Upon occurrence of a secondary infection, no significant increase in PCT and CRP levels was observed in the D+T− group (p = 0.052 and p = 0.08, respectively). Although PCT levels increased significantly in patients of the D+T+ group who developed a secondary infection (p = 0.0003), this rise was only apparent from day 2 post-infection onwards. CRP levels remained suppressed in the D+T+ group. Receiver operating curve analysis of PCT and CRP levels yielded area under the curves of 0.52 and 0.55, respectively, which are both markedly lower than those found in the group of COVID-19 patients not treated with immunomodulatory drugs (0.80 and 0.76, respectively, with p values for differences between groups of 0.001 and 0.02, respectively).ConclusionsCessation of dexamethasone in critically ill COVID-19 patients results in a rebound increase in PCT and CRP levels unrelated to the occurrence of secondary bacterial infections. Furthermore, immunomodulatory treatment with dexamethasone and tocilizumab considerably reduces the value of PCT and CRP for detection of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients.

Highlights

  • Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by inflammatory damage to various tissues, the lung

  • Immunomodulatory treatment with dexamethasone and tocilizumab considerably reduces the value of PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) for detection of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients

  • We investigated serial PCT and CRP levels in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone only or in combination with tocilizumab, and compared the natural course and accuracy to detect bacterial infections to the data obtained from patients that did not receive these immunomodulatory treatments [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by inflammatory damage to various tissues, the lung. The immunomodulatory drugs dexamethasone [7, 8] and the human anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab [9, 10] have been shown to exert beneficial clinical effects in patients with severe COVID19 and have become part of standard care The effects of these therapies on PCT and CRP levels in critically ill COVID-19 patients are largely unclear, but were previously assessed in non-COVID-19 patients. We investigated serial PCT and CRP levels in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone only or in combination with tocilizumab, and compared the natural course and accuracy to detect bacterial infections to the data obtained from patients that did not receive these immunomodulatory treatments [5]. We investigated PCT and CRP kinetics in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone with or without tocilizumab, and assessed the value of these biomarkers to detect secondary bacterial infections

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call