Abstract

Background: Mass deworming affects millions of children afflicted by intestinal parasites.We aimed to assess differences in effects of deworming on nutritional and cognitive outcomes across potential effect modifiers. Methods: For this systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD), we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service, Public Affairs Information Service, Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts to March 27, 2018. We searched grey literature, contacted authors and screened reviews. We included randomized and quasi randomized trials of deworming children compared to placebo or other nutritional or deworming interventions with data on baseline infection. We used a frequentist approach for random-effects network meta-analysis with IPD using General Linear Mixed Models, assessed Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE for overall quality, following a pre-specified protocol. The main outcomes were weight, height, haemoglobin and cognition. Findings: We received IPD from 19 RCTs of STH deworming with 31,945 participants. For deworming for schistosomiasis alone, we received too few studies. Overall risk of bias was low. STH deworming vs. placebo effect on weight was 0.01 kg (95%CI: -0.08 to 0.11), height 0.09 cm (95%CI: -0.08, to 0.27) (moderate certainty), and haemoglobin 0.32 g/L (95%CI: -0.63 to 1.26) (low certainty). No study showed important effects on cognition (low certainty). There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across age, sex, nutritional status or infection intensity. Confidence limits included important effects on weight and haemoglobin for children with higher intensity infections. Interpretation: Deworming for STH alone is insufficient to improve child nutrition and cognition at population level in areas with light intensity infections. Funding Statement: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Declaration of Interests: Dr. Friis reports grants from ARLA Food for Health Center, grants from Danish Dairy Research Foundation, grants from Nutriset, outside the submitted work. Dr. Elliott reports grants from Wellcome Trust, during the conduct of the study. Dr. King reports grants from World Health Organization for work included in the study. Dr. LIU reports grants from International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China, during the conduct of the study. All other authors state they have nothing to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Bruyere Research Institute and SickKids research ethics boards.

Highlights

  • In 2014, over 800 million people were infected with soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and waterborne schistosomes (Pullan et al 2014)

  • There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across age, sex, nutritional status or infection intensity for each type of STH. These analyses showed that children with moderate or heavy intensity infections, deworming for STH may increase weight gain

  • We aimed to explore the importance of effect modifiers using individual participant data (IPD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2014, over 800 million people were infected with soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and waterborne schistosomes (Pullan et al 2014). Mass deworming has been described as one of the most cost-effective development interventions (Bundy et al 2018). The WHO 2017 guidelines recommend annual or biannual mass deworming for children, to be accompanied with hygiene and water interventions (World Health Organization 2017). Two recent systematic reviews on mass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths concluded there was little to no effect on nutritional status, cognition or school attendance (Taylor-Robinson et al 2015; Welch et al 2016). These reviews did not find evidence of subgroup effects across the intensity of infection, prevalence, nutritional status or sex. A different meta-analysis found larger effects for weight in areas with a higher prevalence of STH infections (Croke et al 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call