Abstract

The paradigm shift brought about by the expansion of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine away from the use of biomaterials, currently questions the value of histopathologic methods in the evaluation of biological changes. To date, the available tools of evaluation are not fully consistent and satisfactory for these advanced therapies. We have developed a new, simple and inexpensive quantitative digital approach that provides key metrics for structural and compositional characterization of the regenerated tissues. For example, metrics provide the tissue ingrowth rate (TIR) which integrates two separate indicators; the cell ingrowth rate (CIR) and the total collagen content (TCC) as featured in the equation, TIR% = CIR% + TCC%. Moreover a subset of quantitative indicators describing the directional organization of the collagen (relating structure and mechanical function of tissues), the ratio of collagen I to collagen III (remodeling quality) and the optical anisotropy property of the collagen (maturity indicator) was automatically assessed as well. Using an image analyzer, all metrics were extracted from only two serial sections stained with either Feulgen & Rossenbeck (cell specific) or Picrosirius Red F3BA (collagen specific). To validate this new procedure, three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds were intraperitoneally implanted in healthy and in diabetic rats. It was hypothesized that quantitatively, the healing tissue would be significantly delayed and of poor quality in diabetic rats in comparison to healthy rats. In addition, a chemically modified 3D scaffold was similarly implanted in a third group of healthy rats with the assumption that modulation of the ingrown tissue would be quantitatively present in comparison to the 3D scaffold-healthy group. After 21 days of implantation, both hypotheses were verified by use of this novel computerized approach. When the two methods were run in parallel, the quantitative results revealed fine details and differences not detected by the semi-quantitative assessment, demonstrating the importance of quantitative analysis in the performance evaluation of soft tissue healing. This automated and supervised method reduced operator dependency and proved to be simple, sensitive, cost-effective and time-effective. It supports objective therapeutic comparisons and helps to elucidate regeneration and the dynamics of a functional tissue.

Highlights

  • As early as the mid-1950s, Sewell et al (1955) introduced a groundbreaking histopathologic method for evaluation of biomaterial effects that was based on a grading scale of the local tissue reaction [1]

  • The composite 3D meshes of this study went into two distinct configurations, (1) ParietexTM Composite Mesh (PCO), (2) a prototype with a film made of a combination of oxidized collagen mixed with Chitosan

  • Numerous therapeutic products have been developed in the last decades to improve soft tissue healing or regeneration, even in conditions known for poor wound healing, and minimize patient discomfort, healing length, chronic pain, infection and disability [33,34,35]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As early as the mid-1950s, Sewell et al (1955) introduced a groundbreaking histopathologic method for evaluation of biomaterial effects that was based on a grading scale of the local tissue reaction [1]. Their contribution, aimed at reducing biases as much as possible, was linked to the evaluation of biomaterial tissue reaction that was formerly only based on subjective qualitative analysis. Semi-quantitative score-based assessment still remains subjective as it mostly depends on the experience and interpretation of the readers This is stressed when implant performance matters for its intended functions [4]. Statistical quantitative analysis is desired for unbiased and objective evaluation of innovative therapeutic products whether for screening or as a last step testing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.