Abstract
The main factors influencing the choice of individual subjects of the scientific activity or potential partners and executors for scientific and educational projects were analyzed. The specific features of choosing project executors of different categories were indicated. The functional responsibilities of project participants in accordance with the project structure were described. The individually oriented method for choosing subjects of scientific activity as executors of scientific and educational projects was developed, taking into account the productivity of their scientific activities in the past and considering the structure of projects. To determine the merits of the subjects of scientific activity, which are included in the relevant scientific subject spaces, it is necessary to apply the procedure of their productivity assessment. In addition, it is necessary to predict a change in productivity in the future based on retrospective data for this subject. Next, it is required to solve the multi-criteria problem of the choice among the subjects of scientific activity who are quite productive in the opinion of the project manager. The use of the developed method reduces the subjective impact on making a decision regarding the choice of project executors. This is due to the fact that they are chosen by automated calculation of scientometric indicators of subjects, guided only by open sources of information. The individually oriented method for the selection of subjects of scientific activity was verified on the example of the formation of three applications of research projects. As a result, the average percentage of scientists who meet the requirements of project managers for each scientific subject space was about 46.55 %. The percentage of those involved in the project from those who were selected is about 24.07 %. The probability of cooperation is higher among those who have an average H-index.
Highlights
The key prerequisite for ensuring scientific and technological progress is the creation of conditions for the functioning of the concept of open innovations [1]
It is necessary to highlight special types of project executors: individual subjects of scientific activity, that is, researchers and collective subjects of scientific activity. This is proved in paper [2], which proposed the concept of open innovations in science (OIS), which implies the application of open and joint practices during the process of creating and disseminating new scientific ideas
To determine the advantages of the subjects that are included in the scientific subject space, it is necessary to apply the procedure for assessing their performance
Summary
The key prerequisite for ensuring scientific and technological progress is the creation of conditions for the functioning of the concept of open innovations [1] This involves external partners, executors, experts, etc. The relevant problem is to highlight the conditions that would specify the factors of selection of partners with different competencies for the implementation of different stages of a project and taking into consideration the level of knowledge. It is necessary to highlight special types of project executors: individual subjects of scientific activity, that is, researchers and collective subjects of scientific activity (higher education institutions, research institutes, etc.) This is proved in paper [2], which proposed the concept of open innovations in science (OIS), which implies the application of open and joint practices during the process of creating and disseminating new scientific ideas
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
