Abstract

Device-free localization (DFL) systems that rely on the wireless received signal strength indicator (RSSI) metric to localize targets with no device attached to them have been reported in the literature for almost a decade. Approaches using RSSI can be split into three main categories. Link-based approaches utilize weighted summation or probabilistic methods to infer location. Location-based approaches create a fingerprint map of an area. Radio Tomographic Imaging treat DFL as an imaging problem solved with a linear inverse. In this paper, we implement and investigate the performance of all three major RSSI approaches in two test environments. We demonstrate how different environments and walking trajectories can have significant effects on the localization accuracy. The experimental results lead us to the conclusion that without implementing and testing within the same environment for the same target trajectories, the performance of various classes of DFL systems cannot be reliably evaluated. Relying on the stated accuracy from the literature for comparison is a flawed premise.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call