Abstract

PurposeThis article examines whether deviations from fundamental value or closed-end country fund's discounts or premiums forecast future share price returns or net asset returns.Design/methodology/approachThe main empirical (econometric) tool is a vector autoregressive (VAR) model. The authors model share price returns and net asset returns as a function of their lagged values, the discounts or premiums, and a control variable for local market returns. The authors also conduct Dickey Fuller and Granger causality tests as well as impulse response functions.FindingsIt was found that deviations from fundamental value do predict share price returns. This predictability is contrary to weak-form market efficiency. Premiums or discounts predict net asset returns but weakly.Originality/valueThe findings point to the idea that the closed-end fund market is somewhat predictable and inefficient (in its weak form) since the market appears to be able to anticipate a fund's future returns using information contained in the premiums (or discounts). In particular, the market has the ability to anticipate future behaviour because growing premiums forecast declining share price returns for one or two periods ahead.

Highlights

  • Closed-end funds (CEFs) are investment companies that issue a fixed number of shares and invest the resources pursuing the objective of the fund

  • According to Roenfeldt and Tuttle (1973), even though some funds trade at a premium, discounts of 10 and 20% are the norm for CEFs

  • This paper analyses the predictive power of premiums on the future share price and net assets returns of a sample of closed-end funds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Closed-end funds (CEFs) are investment companies that issue a fixed number of shares and invest the resources pursuing the objective of the fund. Unlike more popular open-end funds, CEF shares (traded on a stock exchange) cannot be redeemed by investors at their net asset value (NAV). It is widely acknowledged that CEF share prices trade at levels that are significantly different from the market value of the assets that the CEF invests in. This phenomenon is known as the closed-end fund puzzle. Based on Lee et al (1991) this cycle has four parts: (1) CEFs start trading at a premium of almost 10%.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call