Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the notion of sexual perversion as defined by Alan Goldman. He considered perverse those behaviors that represent a deviation of the norm that can only be statistical and in no way different. He also states that what we characterize as sexually perverted does not entail moral implications, because there is no morality inherent in sex. By analyzing Goldman?s theory and critiques addressed to it (which base their definitions on the notions of love, communication, reproductive function), we will come to the conclusion that the notion of statistical norm, when certain places were revised in Goldman?s theory, especially those related to moral implications, provides the best explanation for sexual perversions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call