Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review recent developments pertaining to risk management in Islamic banking and finance literature. The study explores the fundamental features of risks associated with Islamic banks (IBs) as compared to those associated with conventional banks (CBs) in order to determine the extent to which IBs engage in effective risk mitigation. The study includes a consideration of the major studies in which the fundamental features of Islamic banks and finance (IBF) and the main characteristics of risk management in IBs are analyzed in comparison with those of CBs. Specifically, these two kinds of banks are compared in relation to the types of risks faced, the characteristics of those risks, and the nature and extent of exposure to those risks. A tabular methodology approach is used in concert with a comparative literature review approach for the analysis. The results show that there is weak support for Shariah-based product development due to the lack of risk mitigation expertise in IBs. The conclusion presented is that in comparison with CBs, IBs are more risk-sensitive due to the nature of their products, contract structure, legal costing, governance practices, and liquidity infrastructure. Furthermore, the determinants of the credit risk of Islamic banks in Malaysia (MIBs) are examined. Overall, bank capital and financing expansion have a significant negative impact on the credit risk level of IBs in Malaysia.

Highlights

  • Since its inception, the banking industry—whether conventional banks (CBs) or Islamic banks (IBs)—has focused on risk-return trade-off activities

  • We investigate the determinants of credit risk for 19 Malaysian Islamic banks (MIBs) based on data that we collected from the financial statements and annual reports of each of these banks

  • We reviewed the main characteristics of IBs in comparison with the main characteristics of CBs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The banking industry—whether conventional banks (CBs) or Islamic banks (IBs)—has focused on risk-return trade-off activities Both types of financial institutions serve as intermediaries between borrowers and lenders and provide avenues through which clients can invest and/or save their money. A bank’s main function is to receive money from individuals and firms who have money they do not need immediately (depositors) and channel it to clients who need the money (entrepreneurs) for diverse projects that are subject to various types of risks. These clients include individuals, partnerships, joint ventures, and/or corporations that are either privately/family owned or publicly listed on the stock exchange (Lucia and Peters 1993). The purpose of the present study is to review various types of risks associated with the financial industry, as they relate to IBs

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call