Abstract

BackgroundMineral phosphorus (P) fertilizers must be used wisely in order to preserve rock phosphate, a limited and non‐renewable resource. The use of bio‐inoculants to improve soil nutrient availability and trigger an efficient plant response to nutrient deficiency is one potential strategy in the attempt to decrease P inputs in agriculture.MethodAn in vitro co‐cultivation system was used to study the response of Brachypodium distachyon to contrasted P supplies (soluble and poorly soluble forms of P) and inoculation with P solubilizing bacteria. Brachypodium's responses to P conditions and inoculation with bacteria were studied in terms of developmental plasticity and P use efficiency.Results Brachypodium showed plasticity in its biomass allocation pattern in response to variable P conditions, specifically by prioritizing root development over shoot productivity under poorly soluble P conditions. Despite the ability of the bacteria to solubilize P, shoot productivity was depressed in plants inoculated with bacteria, although the root system development was maintained. The negative impact of bacteria on biomass production in Brachypodium might be attributed to inadequate C supply to bacteria, an increased competition for P between both organisms under P‐limiting conditions, or an accumulation of toxic bacterial metabolites in our cultivation system. Both P and inoculation treatments impacted root system morphology. The modulation of Brachypodium's developmental response to P supplies by P solubilizing bacteria did not lead to improved P use efficiency.ConclusionOur results support the hypothesis that plastic responses of Brachypodium cultivated under P‐limited conditions are modulated by P solubilizing bacteria. The considered experimental context impacts plant–bacteria interactions. Choosing experimental conditions as close as possible to real ones is important in the selection of P solubilizing bacteria. Both persistent homology and allometric analyses proved to be useful tools that should be considered when studying the impact of bio‐inoculants on plant development in response to varying nutritional context.

Highlights

  • An important challenge for this century is to implement sustainable cropping systems that preserve the environment and non-renewable resources

  • Brachypodium acquired and accumulated a greater amount of P in shoots when Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or HA were added to the nutrient solution, in comparison with the P- treatment and regardless of Plants grown under soluble P deficiency were more efficient at utilizing P for biomass accumulation (PUtE, biomass produced by unit of plant P content; p < .001; Figure 7k–n)

  • This study aimed to explore the impact of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) inoculation on the response of Brachypodium distachyon Bd21 to contrasted P conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important challenge for this century is to implement sustainable cropping systems that preserve the environment and non-renewable resources. As the European Union is strongly dependent on P imports (van Dijk et al, 2016), phosphate rock has been classified as a “critical raw material” by the European Commission since 2014 (European Commission, 2014) These considerations emphasize the necessity of adapting fertilization strategies. The negative impact of bacteria on biomass production in Brachypodium might be attributed to inadequate C supply to bacteria, an increased competition for P between both organisms under P-limiting conditions, or an accumulation of toxic bacterial metabolites in our cultivation system. Both P and inoculation treatments impacted root system morphology. Choosing experimental conditions as close as possible to real ones is important in the selection of Abbreviations: HA, hydroxyapatite; NBRIP, National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate growth medium; P, phosphorus; PPUE, physiological P use efficiency; PSB, phosphatesolubilizing bacteria; PUE, P use efficiency; PUpE, P uptake efficiency; PUtE, P utilization efficiency; RMF, root mass fraction; SMA, standardized major axis; TCP, tricalcium phosphate; TRL, total root length

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call