Abstract

Impulsivity—the extent to which a reward is devalued by the amount of time until it is realized—can be affected by an individual’s current energetic state and long-term developmental history. In European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), a previous study found that birds that were lighter for their skeletal size, and birds that had undergone greater shortening of erythrocyte telomeres over the course of development, were more impulsive as adults. Here, we studied the impulsivity of a separate cohort of 29 starlings hand-reared under different combinations of food amount and begging effort. The task involved repeated choice between a key yielding one pellet after 3 s and another key yielding two pellets after 8 s. Impulsivity was operationalised as the proportion of choices for the short-delay option. We found striking variation in impulsivity. We did not replicate the results of the previous study concerning developmental telomere attrition, though combining all the evidence to date in a meta-analysis did support that robustness of that association. We also found that early-life conditions and mass for skeletal size interacted in predicting impulsivity. Specifically, birds that had experienced the combination of high begging effort and low food amount were less impulsive than other groups, and the usual negative relationship between impulsivity and body mass was abolished in birds that had experienced high begging effort. We discuss methodological differences between our study and studies that measure impulsivity using an adjusting-delay procedure.

Highlights

  • Every day animals make many choices between pursuing a larger future reward and pursuing a more immediate smaller one

  • We examined the associations between developmental experience, developmental telomere attrition, energetic reserves, and impulsivity in adulthood in a cohort of hand-reared starlings

  • Our impulsivity task differed from earlier studies in that it did not involve an adjusting delay, and excluded the possibility of its results being influenced by risk preference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Every day animals make many choices between pursuing a larger future reward and pursuing a more immediate smaller one. Impulsivity in decision-making is context and state dependent, that is, it is influenced by the objective value of the rewards involved, but by the state of the individual, and their ecological milieu There are short-term energetic influences: animals, including humans, often become more impulsive as their energetic reserves decrease or the time since they last ate increases (Snyderman 1983; Wang and Dvorak 2010; Bateson et al 2015; Mayack and Naug 2015; Allen and Nettle 2019). In humans, coming from a more deprived childhood background is robustly associated with increased impulsivity (Paál et al 2015; Allen and Nettle 2019). In non-human systems, the evidence is more equivocal: manipulating developmental conditions has been found in some studies to affect impulsivity in adulthood (early stress leading to greater impulsivity; Gondré-Lewis et al 2016), but in other studies to affect other behavioural traits but not impulsivity (Lovic et al 2011; Brydges et al 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call