Abstract

Although it has been argued that the structure of executive function (EF) may change developmentally, there is little empirical research to examine this view in middle childhood and adolescence. The main objective of this study was to examine developmental changes in the component structure of EF in a large sample (N = 457) of 7–15 year olds. Participants completed batteries of tasks that measured three components of EF: updating working memory (UWM), inhibition, and shifting. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test five alternative models in 7–9 year olds, 10–12 year olds, and 13–15 year olds. The results of CFA showed that a single-factor EF model best explained EF performance in 7–9-year-old and 10–12-year-old groups, namely unitary EF, though this single factor explained different amounts of variance at these two ages. In contrast, a three-factor model that included UWM, inhibition, and shifting best accounted for the data from 13–15 year olds, namely diverse EF. In sum, during middle childhood, putative measures of UWM, inhibition, and shifting may rely on similar underlying cognitive processes. Importantly, our findings suggest that developmental dissociations in these three EF components do not emerge until children transition into adolescence. These findings provided empirical evidence for the development of EF structure which progressed from unity to diversity during middle childhood and adolescence.

Highlights

  • Executive function (EF) is the ability to monitor and regulate different types of cognition and behavior to achieve specific internal goals [1,2]

  • Post-hoc Bonferroni tests showed that the performance for the 1-back, 2-back, running memory, go/ no-go, and Stroop tasks was better in 13–15 year olds than in 10– 12 year olds, and better in 10–12 year olds than in 7–9 year olds

  • The present study investigated the developmental changes in the factor structure of EF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Executive function (EF) is the ability to monitor and regulate different types of cognition and behavior to achieve specific internal goals [1,2]. EF serves as an umbrella term that includes multiple processing components, such as attentional control, cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, inhibition, intentional control, purposive action, set maintenance, working memory, and planning [3,4,5]. Among these components, updating working memory (UWM), inhibition, and shifting are the most widely researched EF processes [2,6,7,8], because they are lower-level (i.e., supposedly implicated in complex executive components, such as planning), and relatively well-defined [2]. Shifting is the ability to flexibly switch between mental sets, mental operations or different task rules [11,2]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call