Abstract

Background: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) defines a heterogeneous class of children exhibiting marked impairment in motor coordination as a general group of deficits in fine and gross motricity (subtype mixed group) common to all research studies, and with a variety of other motor disorders that have been little investigated. No consensus about symptoms and etiology has been established.Methods: Data from 58 children aged 6 to 13 years with DCD were collected on DSM-IV criteria, similar to DSM-5 criteria. They had no other medical condition and inclusion criteria were strict (born full-term, no medication, no occupational/physical therapy). Multivariate statistical methods were used to evidence relevant interactions between discriminant features in a general DCD subtype group and to highlight specific co-morbidities. The study examined age-calibrated standardized scores from completed assessments of psychological, neuropsychological, and neuropsychomotor functions, and more specifically the presence of minor neurological dysfunctions (MND) including neurological soft signs (NSS), without evidence of focal neurological brain involvement. These were not considered in most previous studies.Results: Findings show the salient DCD markers for the mixed subtype (imitation of gestures, digital perception, digital praxia, manual dexterity, upper, and lower limb coordination), vs. surprising co-morbidities, with 33% of MND with mild spasticity from phasic stretch reflex (PSR), not associated with the above impairments but rather with sitting tone (p = 0.004) and dysdiadochokinesia (p = 0.011). PSR was not specific to a DCD subtype but was related to increased impairment of coordination between upper and lower limbs and manual dexterity. Our results highlight the major contribution of an extensive neuro-developmental assessment (mental and physical).Discussion: The present study provides important new evidence in favor of a complete physical neuropsychomotor assessment, including neuromuscular tone examination, using appropriate standardized neurodevelopmental tools (common tasks across ages with age-related normative data) in order to distinguish motor impairments gathered under the umbrella term of developmental coordination disorders (subcortical vs. cortical). Mild spasticity in the gastrocnemius muscles, such as phasic stretch reflex (PSR), suggests disturbances of the motor pathway, increasing impairment of gross and fine motricity. These findings contribute to understanding the nature of motor disorders in DCD by taking account of possible co-morbidities (corticospinal tract disturbances) to improve diagnosis and adapt treatment programmes in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAccording to current DSM criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) a diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) can be given to children who firstly exhibit marked impairment in the development of motor skills or motor coordination in comparison to peer groups (e.g., catching an object, using scissors or cutlery, handwriting, riding a bike, or participating in sports), no cut-off exists (criterion A) and secondly, an interference with activities of daily living and impact on academic performance, prevocational and vocational activities, leisure, and play (criterion B)

  • According to current DSM criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) a diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) can be given to children who firstly exhibit marked impairment in the development of motor skills or motor coordination in comparison to peer groups, no cut-off exists and secondly, an interference with activities of daily living and impact on academic performance, prevocational and vocational activities, leisure, and play

  • The mixed subgroup (MX) group has long been shown to define a clearcut category in previous studies, with high levels of motor impairment in fine and global motricity (Lyytinen and Ahonen, 1988; Lundy-Ekman et al, 1991; Dewey and Kaplan, 1994; Hoare, 1994; Miyahara, 1994; Wright and Sugden, 1996; Macnab et al, 2001; Green et al, 2008; Vaivre-Douret et al, 2011a; Wilson et al, 2013), authors do not agree on a common etiology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to current DSM criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) a diagnosis of DCD can be given to children who firstly exhibit marked impairment in the development of motor skills or motor coordination in comparison to peer groups (e.g., catching an object, using scissors or cutlery, handwriting, riding a bike, or participating in sports), no cut-off exists (criterion A) and secondly, an interference with activities of daily living and impact on academic performance, prevocational and vocational activities, leisure, and play (criterion B). The motor skill deficits are not better explained by intellectual disability (intellectual developmental disorder) or visual impairment and are not attributable to a neurological condition affecting movement (e.g., cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, degenerative disorder) (criterion D). Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) defines a heterogeneous class of children exhibiting marked impairment in motor coordination as a general group of deficits in fine and gross motricity (subtype mixed group) common to all research studies, and with a variety of other motor disorders that have been little investigated.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call