Abstract

Is the quality of the human embryos generated by twinning in vitro comparable to the quality of the embryos created by fertilization? Our data suggest that the human twin embryos created in vitro are unsuitable not only for clinical use but also for research purposes. Pregnancy from in vitro generated monozygotic twins by embryo splitting or twinning leads to live birth of healthy animals. Similar strategies, however, have been less successful in primates. Recent reports suggest that the splitting of human embryos might result in viable, morphologically adequate blastocysts, although the qualitative analyses of the embryos created in such a way have been very limited. This study was a comparative analysis of embryos generated by twinning in vitro and the embryos created by in vitro fertilization. We analysed morphokinetics and developmental competence of 176 twin embryos created by splitting of 88 human embryos from either early (2-5 blastomeres, n = 43) or late (6-10 blastomeres, n = 45) cleavage stages. We compared the data with morphometrics of embryos created by in vitro fertilization and resulting in pregnancy and live birth upon single blastocyst transfer (n = 42). The morphokinetic data suggested that the human preimplantation development is subjected to a strict temporal control. Due to a 'developmental clock', the size of twin embryos was proportionate to the number of cells used for their creation. Furthermore, the first fate decision was somewhat delayed; the inner cell mass (ICM) became distinguishable later in the twin than in the normal blastocysts obtained through fertilization. If an ICM was present at all, it was small and of poor quality. The majority of the cells in the twin embryos expressed ICM and trophectoderm markers simultaneously. We created monozygotic twins by blastomere separation from cleavage stage embryos. Embryo twinning by blastocyst bisection may circumvent limitations set by the developmental clock. Taken together, our data suggest that the human twin embryos created in vitro are unsuitable not only for clinical use but also for research purposes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call