Abstract
Opinion in essays by the Brazilian military elite, published in their professional journals, is analyzed-prior to the military takeover, and at regular intervals during their 21 years of political control-to consider aspects and patterns of ideologic differences concerning national development strategy. This study finds one major and another minor faction existed, in addition to the recognized moderate and hard-line groups that alternatively headed Brazil's military regimes. Using their articles as a data base, the author detects the rising importance of an independence-minded nationalist cadre in the 1970s, which was also divided between those with authoritarian and democratic attitudes. Neither was dominant and in fact had to share ruling power with a moderate, internationalist faction to preserve necessary unity. The democratic nationalists, initially suppressed in the wake of purges of the reformist, leftist faction who had been Goulart appointees, gained strength during the presidencies of Geisel and Figuereido, thereby influencing and sustaining the promised transition toward civilian rule and democratic political processes. Development strategy did not shift toward the independent, nationalist direction, however, because of adverse external factors, the prior successes of the first military regimes, and the continuing need to preserve armed forces unity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.