Abstract
Abstract. Neighbouring towns in urban clusters of Canada exhibit similar levels of socio‐economic development. However, when measured by different development indicators, inter‐town development association differs in both nature and degree. In core areas, for instance, only population and housing variables exhibit a strong spatial association, while that of employment‐related variables – average income, and unemployment rate – is weaker. This tendency reflects the fundamental difference between the two groups of variables. While population and housing variables are associated with the clustering of residents in socially homogenous areas, inter‐town development similarity in respect to employment‐related variables is weaker, apparently due to long‐distance commuting. The article discusses the importance of urban clustering as a factor in regional development policies and programmes, and provides support for including cluster‐related elements in a strategy to enhance urban growth in underdeveloped regions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have