Abstract

This paper aims to advance our understanding of how children’s use of vocabulary in writing changes as they progress through their school careers. It examines the extent to which a model of lexical sophistication as use of low-frequency, register-appropriate words adequately captures development in vocabulary use across the course of compulsory education in England. We find that the received model needs elaborating in a number of important ways. Specifically: (1) the average frequency of words in the repertoire used by older children is no lower than that of younger children. However, younger children’s writing is characterized by extensive repetition of high frequency verbs and adjectives and of low frequency nouns (the latter being a product of a focus on entities which are rarely discussed in adult writing). The role of repetition in this finding implies that lexical sophistication is inseparable from lexical diversity, a construct which is usually treated as distinct. (2) Younger children’s writing shows a preference for fiction-like vocabulary over academic-like vocabulary. As they mature, children come to make greater use of academic vocabulary in both their literary and non-literary writing, though this increase is greatest in their non-literary writing. Use of fiction vocabulary remains constant across year groups but decreases sharply in non-literary writing, showing an enhanced sense of register appropriateness. This development of register appropriate word use can be captured by relatively simple frequency-based measures that could readily be employed by teachers and researchers to track writers’ development in this aspect of word use.

Highlights

  • This paper aims to advance our understanding of how children’s use of vocabulary in writing changes as they progress through their school careers

  • This development of register appropriate word use can be captured by relatively simple frequency-based measures that could readily be employed by teachers and researchers to track writers’ development in this aspect of word use

  • Our study focuses on children in England, this was considered a more relevant and reliable reference point than the British National Corpus (BNC) both because it is more contemporary and because it is substantially larger (450 million words, in comparison to 100 million words) and covers a greater number of word types (10% of words from the 100 K Contemporary American (COCA) list are not found in the parallel BNC-based list)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper aims to advance our understanding of how children’s use of vocabulary in writing changes as they progress through their school careers It elaborates on existing models of the features of word use which distinguish the writing of older children from that of younger children. It belongs to a tradition going back to at least the 1930s of studying children’s writing development through quantitative analysis of linguistic features. This approach offers a useful complement to qualitative analyses (e.g., Christie & Derewianka, 2008) in that it enables reliable analysis of large numbers of texts, so allowing patterns to emerge which may not be obvious in smaller samples and supporting robust generalizations. Vocabulary development is well-suited to this type of analysis, both because the units of analysis (words) are more numerous than the units of syntax and because they are more identified by automated means, so allowing relatively reliable analysis

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call