Abstract
Weaknesses in student analysis and evaluation reasoning related to material faced by behavior and the level of mental life. the imprecision of students making logical arguments to solve problems with the approach. The inaccuracy of students' thinking results in students not arguing enough to provide scientific considerations. The research aims to develop problem-based learning teaching materials to improve students' critical thinking patterns. The development model uses the 4D that has four stages of the development process, namely: Define, Design, and Develop. Based on the results of the validation, the level of students' critical thinking patterns reached 0.83 with a high level of validation. Content component 3.64, linguistic component 3.71, presentation component 3.70, and practicality component 3.68. The results obtained indicate that problem-based learning-based psychoanalytic teaching materials for improving students' critical thinking patterns are valid, effective, and practical. Teaching materials based on problem-based learning can be used as one of the teaching materials for students.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
