Abstract

The research aims to develop Sense of Life Scale of Taiwan college students. In accordance with the related literature, most Western scholars adopted Frankl's Logotherapy for developing Sense of Life Scale, which consists of freedom of will, will to meaning and meaning of life. The research also adopts these three beliefs as research factors; furthermore, with the related literature and measurements, 20-items questionnaire was designed. Owing to the past instrument have already proved the existence of three factors within sense of life meaning, CFA was directly applied for the research. This part is categorized into three models: (1) The initial model: the result reveals that two items' factor loadings are under .55., and need to be delete. (2) The modified model: After deleted two items, the model retested, and reveal firstly, the whole applicableness is acceptable; secondly, item quality test isn't under the situation of offending estimates (it means all output data are in an acceptable range); thirdly, internal construct applicableness analysis consisting of component reliability, average variance extracted; AVE (ρv), competitive model comparison, and sex-group measurement identity test all qualified. (3) Cross-validity model: For the modified model, the research investigate another samples (N =405), and after the re-verification, the outcome present acceptable whole applicableness. Therefore, the three factors 18 item scale of Sense of Life Meaning is built.

Highlights

  • Sense of life meaning means the consistence among the pursuit and the realization of goal and its joyfulness after accomplishment(Reker, 2000) [1]

  • Results revealed that one-fourth college students feel that they are lacking of life purpose and meaning

  • With the development of sense of life meaning scale, the research plans the first draft from the interview with three college students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sense of life meaning means the consistence among the pursuit and the realization of goal and its joyfulness after accomplishment(Reker, 2000) [1]. Crumbaugh & Maholick's (1964) [6] designed the Purpose in Life Test [PIL]. Its research samples were 873 college students, and analyzed the relationship among sense of life meaning, responsibility, self-advancement, time awareness. The sense of life meaning adopted Crumbaugh & Maholick's (1964) [6] designed the Purpose in Life Test [PIL] to realize individual awareness for his/her life purpose and meaning. Results revealed that one-fourth college students feel that they are lacking of life purpose and meaning. For it is the research 28 years ago, for the development and advancement in political, social, education, technology, industry, and economics in Taiwan, the recent situation of modern college students must have different thoughts on their sense of life meaning. For the validity of Ho(1990) [8]’s Life Attitude Profile has its significance; with the difference of times, the revised scale needs to be in the same pace of the current situation in accordance with modern education society circumstances

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call