Abstract

This research explores potential benefits of the spontaneous collaboration of a small group of teachers regarding their professional identity (PI) and related metacognitive thinking procedures. The researcher conceptualizes the co-operation of PI and metacognition via interactive pedagogical problem-solving and presents spontaneous collaboration processes of a beginning teacher (BT) and an experienced teacher (ET) of English. Based on the qualitative approach, it was revealed that the BT often referred to the ET’s meanings constituting her PI, but through pedagogic experimentations and dialogic meaning negotiations, BT gradually improved her meanings/PI and related metacognitive thinking procedures as identified BT becoming more self-critical and pursuing professionalism. The ET reshaped her meanings/PI through constant monitoring and regulations, stimulated by the BT, and elaborated these and metacognitive thinking procedures by focusing on what to improve. Implications of the findings are discussed in relation to professional development.

Highlights

  • Teacher interaction contributes to their professional growth

  • Studies of teacher collaboration have focused on revealing the effects of, and the methods for, administratively organized teacher collaboration (Datnow, 2011)

  • Those studies address the influence of collaboration on the development of teacher professionalism or professional identity (PI) (Crafton & Kaiser, 2011; Golombek & Johnson, 2017; Johnson & Golombek, 2020; Prytula & Weiman, 2012; Yuan et al, 2018) but without defining what PI or its development means and without describing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teacher interaction contributes to their professional growth. Working together, teachers share expertise and move beyond individual limitations (Hargreaves, 1994). Through multiple meaning comparisons and negotiations over shared pedagogical problem-solving, teachers develop their PI and related metacognitive thinking procedures (Keestra, 2017; Prytula, 2012) in a personal, social, and dialectic way.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call