Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones.MethodsPatients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework.ResultsOf 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones.ConclusionSSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis.

Highlights

  • Ureteral stones are the most common urologic emergency

  • spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines

  • To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ureteral stones are the most common urologic emergency. They are associated with severe pain, renal obstruction, and urinary tract infection [1]. Indications for the management of ureteral stones are not clearly defined. The clinician’s choice determines whether to wait for spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) or perform active treatment, including extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy, laparoscopic removal, or percutaneous treatment. In some instances, active treatment may be provided without waiting for SSP, in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications, including recurrent attacks of renal colic, urinary tract infection, and deterioration of renal function, which might be considered as over-treatment. Suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call