Development of Polythiophene–Tripeptide Covalent Conjugates Showing Excellent Structure-Dependent Photophysical and Photocurrent Properties

Abstract

Presently, conducting polymer–peptide conjugates have drawn great interest for their interesting optoelectronic and photophysical properties. To understand the structural dependence of the conjugates on their properties, we have covalently coupled poly(3-thiophene acetic acid) (P3TAA) with a C-protected tripeptide, H2N-F-F-V-OMe (TPEP), to produce their conjugate PTCP-I. A carboxylic acid-deprotected tripeptide polythiophene conjugate (PTCP-II) is also produced by alkaline hydrolysis of PTCP-I to delineate any difference in properties due to the change in molecular structure. The stretching frequencies for −NH– and >C═O groups of PTCP-II are 11 and 26 cm–1 lower than those of PTCP-I, indicating better intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions in the former. This alters the seaweed morphology of PTCP-I to a sheet morphology for PTCP-II. The blue shift of the π–π* absorption band of polythiophene with gradually increasing the PTCP-I concentration is attributed to the H-type aggregation in DMF solution, but in the solid state, this peak shows a 17 nm red shift from its solution state for better electron delocalization for closer proximity of molecules. The UV–Vis peak of PTCP-II shows a lower blue shift than that of PTCP-I in DMF, attributed to the uncoiled polythiophene chains of the former. In DMF solution, interestingly, both PTCP-I and PTCP-II conjugates exhibit aggregation-induced emission (AIE), showing maxima at 0.08 mg/mL and then aggregation-induced quenching (AIQ) with further increasing its concentration. PTCP-I and PTCP-II exhibit dc conductivities of 0.04 and 0.55 μS cm–1, respectively, at 30 °C, and the higher value for PTCP-II is due to its lower band gap (1.91 eV) compared to that of PTCP-I (2.14 eV). The current (I)–voltage (V) plot of both conjugates exhibits semiconducting properties, which are higher for PTCP-II for its lower band gap. The photocurrent behavior of the conjugates indicates that the on–off response in the PTCP-II system is significantly higher than that in PTCP-I due to the unfolded polymer chain of the former, as the photogenerated electrons and holes can move more freely there. Impedance spectra of both the conjugates show single semicircles for the Nyquist plots, and the charge transfer resistance of PTCP-II is 4.4 times lower than that of PTCP-I but the capacitance value is 27 times higher, arising from the more extended chain configuration of the former, signifying structural importance on the optoelectronic and photocurrent properties of the polymer–peptide conjugates.