Abstract

Social enterprises have become a natural part of the economy. Their importance is significantly increasing, as well as the need to evaluate their performance. There are different points of view on the indicators and methods used to evaluate their performance and they often lack simplicity and are costly and time consuming. Thus, this study aims to identify and discuss performance evaluation indicators for social enterprises with particular focus on identifying a set of indicators that might be applied without placing high demands on each social enterprise. A two-phase approach was adopted and applied in the Czech social entrepreneurship environment. First, the Delphi technique was used to get a set of indicators for each of the areas of the triple bottom line principles. Consequently, an empirical examination of these indicators using a set of social enterprises was conducted. Final results were determined using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). As a result, a set of twelve indicators that cover social, economic, environmental and local areas are proposed. These indicators reflect the opinions of experts in the field as well as their practical usefulness, which is discussed at the end of the paper.

Highlights

  • It has been widely discussed among scholars that social entrepreneurship possesses a permanent and important position in an economy (Alarifi et al, 2019; Bacq & Janssen, 2011)

  • Experts proposed quantitative as well as qualitative indicators and prefer the way of a unified set of indicators over a specific tailored set of indicators that might not be applicable to every social enterprise

  • A fact that cannot be neglected is the relatively low agreement between individual experts. It was observed in each of the areas but the lowest agreement was observed in economic indicators

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been widely discussed among scholars that social entrepreneurship possesses a permanent and important position in an economy (Alarifi et al, 2019; Bacq & Janssen, 2011). There is a lack of a unifying paradigm in the field of social entrepreneurship (Bacq & Janssen, 2011) and from many. One of them concentrates on the evaluation, measurement, and the performance indicators of social enterprises This scope has been attracting significant attention and presents very comprehensive and challenging questions (Bagnoli & Megali, 2011; Crucke & Decramer, 2016; Ebrahim & Rangan, 2014; Irene et al, 2016; Kraus et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call