Abstract
AbstractInductive generalization (i.e., making generalizations from instances) is ubiquitous in human cognition. In the developmental literature, researchers have proposed two theoretical accounts of this important process: a naïve theory account and a similarity‐based account. However, neither of these theoretical accounts explains marked developmental changes in inductive generalization with familiar categories that have been documented in prior research. In this article, I describe briefly a revised version of the similarity‐based account of inductive generalization that can explain individual variability as well as developmental change in inductive generalization with familiar categories. I also highlight several unresolved issues in the study of development of inductive generalization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.