Abstract
In this paper, the general principles of the comparative assessment of the results of procedural activity for objects of executive systems are developed. The system of determining the baseline, relying on that provides accounting of all influencing factors and the possibility of developing a common assessment criterion are proved. An assessment indicator that takes into account all the relevant input and output parameters, and allows comparative assessment of procedural activities of objects of executive systems is developed. Versatility of developed indicator is demonstrated by the comparative assessment of the professional abilities of the subjects and in the decision of selecting the best variant of equipment. Also it is developed a method that compensates for the inequality of expert assessments of input products when assessing the functionality of ES objects. The proposed approach gives the possibility of using common assessment criteria and a common method of reducing the baseline to identify the results of operations of the technical facilities (equipment) and the staff.
Highlights
One of the most important issues related to the assessment activities in the enterprise is the process of object identification performing certain functions.For example, almost all parameters of equipment from different manufacturers, in varying degrees, are different: performance, service life, cost, quality of the output product, deviation from the standard and the percentage of defective products.No possibility of direct methods for comparison leads to a subjective assessment, and, to rather serious tactical mistakes in the selection process.Similar parallels can be made and with respect to personnel assessment
Equipment and personnel of the company perform a function of executive systems (ES)
The aim of this research is to develop a method for the comparative assessment of the functional activity of objects of executive systems
Summary
One of the most important issues related to the assessment activities in the enterprise is the process of object identification performing certain functions.For example, almost all parameters of equipment from different manufacturers, in varying degrees, are different: performance, service life (wearing), cost, quality of the output product, deviation from the standard and the percentage of defective products.No possibility of direct methods for comparison leads to a subjective assessment, and, to rather serious tactical mistakes in the selection process.Similar parallels can be made and with respect to personnel assessment. One of the most important issues related to the assessment activities in the enterprise is the process of object identification performing certain functions. Almost all parameters of equipment from different manufacturers, in varying degrees, are different: performance, service life (wearing), cost, quality of the output product, deviation from the standard and the percentage of defective products. No possibility of direct methods for comparison leads to a subjective assessment, and, to rather serious tactical mistakes in the selection process. Similar parallels can be made and with respect to personnel assessment. Equipment and personnel of the company perform a function of executive systems (ES). Effective functioning of these ES determines the fastest achievement of the supersystem (business owner) [1]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
