Abstract

BackgroundTetraploid cotton contains two sets of homologous chromosomes, the At- and Dt-subgenomes. Consequently, many markers in cotton were mapped to multiple positions during linkage genetic map construction, posing a challenge to anchoring linkage groups and mapping economically-important genes to particular chromosomes. Chromosome-specific markers could solve this problem. Recently, the genomes of two diploid species were sequenced whose progenitors were putative contributors of the At- and Dt-subgenomes to tetraploid cotton. These sequences provide a powerful tool for developing chromosome-specific markers given the high level of synteny among tetraploid and diploid cotton genomes. In this study, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) on each chromosome in the two diploid genomes were characterized. Chromosome-specific SSRs were developed by comparative analysis and proved to distinguish chromosomes.ResultsA total of 200,744 and 142,409 SSRs were detected on the 13 chromosomes of Gossypium arboreum L. and Gossypium raimondii Ulbrich, respectively. Chromosome-specific SSRs were obtained by comparing SSR flanking sequences from each chromosome with those from the other 25 chromosomes. The average was 7,996 per chromosome. To confirm their chromosome specificity, these SSRs were used to distinguish two homologous chromosomes in tetraploid cotton through linkage group construction. The chromosome-specific SSRs and previously-reported chromosome markers were grouped together, and no marker mapped to another homologous chromosome, proving that the chromosome-specific SSRs were unique and could distinguish homologous chromosomes in tetraploid cotton. Because longer dinucleotide AT-rich repeats were the most polymorphic in previous reports, the SSRs on each chromosome were sorted by motif type and repeat length for convenient selection. The primer sequences of all chromosome-specific SSRs were also made publicly available.ConclusionChromosome-specific SSRs are efficient tools for chromosome identification by anchoring linkage groups to particular chromosomes during genetic mapping and are especially useful in mapping of qualitative-trait genes or quantitative trait loci with just a few markers. The SSRs reported here will facilitate a number of genetic and genomic studies in cotton, including construction of high-density genetic maps, positional gene cloning, fingerprinting, and genetic diversity and comparative evolutionary analyses among Gossypium species.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1265-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Tetraploid cotton contains two sets of homologous chromosomes, the At- and Dt-subgenomes

  • We analyzed the distributions of Simple sequence repeat (SSR) with ≥ 3 repeat units and a minimum total length of 15 bp in each of the 13 chromosomes sequences of G. arboreum and G. raimondii to understand their general features in cotton genomes

  • A total of 200,744 SSRs were detected from 13 G. arboreum chromosome sequences, giving an overall density across the chromosomes of 131.03 SSRs/Mb. 142,409 SSRs were detected in the 13 G. raimondii chromosome sequences, giving an overall density of 190.08 SSRs/Mb

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tetraploid cotton contains two sets of homologous chromosomes, the At- and Dt-subgenomes. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites are short (often defined as 1–6 base pairs (bp)) tandem repeat nucleotides in DNA sequences They are ubiquitous in genomes, being found in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes and in any region (protein coding and non-coding) [1,2]. Because of their high mutation rates via insertion or deletion of one or a few repeat units, SSRs have been developed into one of the most popular sources of codominant markers with high information content during the past several years [3]. The availability of genome sequences allows us to mine for SSRs at the genomic level in silico, and analysis of these SSRs has provided insight into their distributions, putative functions, and evolution [14,15]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call