Abstract

BackgroundELISA and CMIA are commonly used for detection of HBsAg. However, few investigations have been performed to evaluate their value in clinical practice, especially when jointly used. A reasonable and economic HBsAg testing algorithm is in great need. MethodsA total of 161,426 specimens in China were tested for 5 serum HBV markers with commonly used ELISA kits. 498 of these specimens were further tested for HBsAg by another ELISA kit, a CMIA kit and an HBsAg confirmatory assay. ResultsThe sensitivities of the 2 ELISA kits were 76.21% and 88.42%, respectively. However, when using “gray-zones”, the sensitivities were significantly improved to 97.43% and 96.43%. Furthermore, the combined use of the 2 ELISA kits and their “gray-zones” improved the sensitivity to 99.04%. Nevertheless, 2.91% of the samples with S/CO values below the lower “gray-zone” limits were reactive by the CMIA kit and then confirmed as HBsAg positive. However, 71.43% of the samples with HBsAg values within 0.05 and 0.10IU/ml detected by the CMIA kit could not be confirmed. ConclusionsAs a rational and economic strategy, combined use of “gray-zones” in ELISA and several different detection assays can significantly increase the efficiency of HBsAg detection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.