Abstract

At present, the formation of authoritative files system is an obligatory condition for organizing and managing electronic catalogues of large scientific libraries. SPSTL SB RAS is managing its own authoritative file of subject headings, the work on which began in 2008, and is actual until today.The paper describes the results of creating and managing an authoritative file of subject headings of SPSTL SB RAS in the period of 2011 – 2020: the history of the file creation is mentioned; the importance of linguistic support of the electronic catalogue for conducting information search is marked; the necessity for analyzing the current state of affairs and evaluating the authoritative file quality is pointed out.The analysis is based on the results of implementing the statement of work for creating the authoritative file; the program of step-by-step works is reproduced and the results of accomplishing each stage, the complexity of the tasks are evaluated.The article indicates the need to edit subject headings in accordance with the requirements of the method of objectification; to pair information search languages: library and bibliographic indices of classification and subject headings. It also indicates the problem of filling the authoritative file with new subject headings, reveals the necessity of checking the vocabulary by alphabetical index. The conclusion forms the notion about the current state of the authoritative file, the terms of work on implementing the statement of work. The main problem of completing the creation of an authoritative file of subject headings of SPSTL SB RAS is indicated; ways to solve this problem are suggested.

Highlights

  • At present, the formation of authoritative files system is an obligatory condition for organizing and managing electronic catalogues of large scientific libraries

  • The analysis is based on the results of implementing the statement of work for creating the authoritative file; the program of step-by-step works is reproduced and the results of accomplishing each stage, the complexity of the tasks are evaluated

  • The article indicates the need to edit subject headings in accordance with the requirements of the method of objectification; to pair information search languages: library and bibliographic indices of classification and subject headings. It indicates the problem of filling the authoritative file with new subject headings, reveals the necessity of checking the vocabulary by alphabetical index

Read more

Summary

Создание основы Авторитетного файла предметных рубрик ГПНТБ СО РАН

2.1.Обеспечение возможности создания авторитет- 2013 ных записей путем ввода с клавиатуры в базе ATHRS в рабочих листах ATHRS, ATHRA, ATHRC, REF, EXP. Обеспечение возможности редактирования предметных рубрик одновременно в авторитетной и библиографической записях ЭК ГПНТБ СО РАН и словаре предметных рубрик. 3. Доработка системы ввода в поля 600, 601, 606, 2014 607 электронного каталога ГПНТБ СО РАН через АФ. Обеспечение поиска через словарь АФ всех предметных рубрик по одному слову из рубрики, по комбинации слов из рубрик, по полному тексту предметной рубрики, по индексу ББК. 4. Наполнение Авторитетного файла предметными 2013–2016 рубриками из полей 606, 607, 600 и индексами ББК из поля 621 электронного каталога ГПНТБ СО РАН. Автоматический ввод предметных рубрик из соответствующих полей электронного каталога ГПНТБ СО РАН. Автоматическая простановка примечания «Запись поступила в результате автоматического ретроввода из ЭК ГПНТБ СО РАН» в соответствующих авторитетных записях. Удаление из списков всех индексов и рубрик, кроме двух наиболее часто совместно присутствующих в записях. Автоматическая простановка в поле «Код системы предметизации» кода «spsl sh»

Отработка технологии предметизации с исполь- 2013–2016 зованием АФ
12. Ввод АФ предметных рубрик ГПНТБ СО РАН в эксплуатацию
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call