Abstract

In the choice experiment framework, it is assumed that respondents consider all the trade-offs among attributes when making their choices. However, there is evidence that respondents may not consider all of them. In the choice-experiment survey to value public goods reported here, a methodology has been developed for analytically determining the value of the coefficient of variation of the conditional distributions to discriminate respondents attending/ignoring one attribute. Results show that (at the respondent level) the analytically determined critical values exhibit a better concordance with the stated preferences than if the rule of thumb with an arbitrary value of two (assumed in previous research) is used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call