Abstract

Urinary incontinence (UI) is experienced by an estimated 51% of women in the U.S. and often results from impaired function or weakening of the pelvic floor muscles. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a frontline nonsurgical treatment, yet a number of symptomatic individuals cannot accurately perform a pelvic floor muscle contraction with simple verbal or written instruction. Long-term adherence to PFMT regimens is often a barrier to resolution of symptoms. Various biofeedback tools have been utilized to aid correct pelvic floor muscle performance and adherence. One novel device, the leva® Pelvic Digital Health System, utilizes an intravaginal probe embedded with MEMS accelerometer sensors that allow real-time visualization of the shape and motion of the vagina during PFMT. Early positive results with this device prompted design of a wearable version. The purpose of this study was to design a wearable, wireless clinical research device to optimize MEMS accelerometer sensor placement to detect maximal movement during a pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) and to test the form factor for retention and user acceptability. The device comprised a ring designed to sit at the fornix with an extension following the length of the vagina. This paper presents design components and results from clinical testing of 10 subjects. It was determined that a ring form factor alone, similar to other vaginal rings (pessaries, estrogen rings) provided less accurate visual information about PFME performance. By contrast, we determined that a ring with an extension allowed for device retention and improved real-time detection of vaginal shape and motion during PFMT.

Highlights

  • Biofeedback tools, such as surface electromyography and pressure perineometry serve as proxies to estimate pelvic floor muscles (PFM) contraction, though validity of such tools remains questionable, and large-scale analyses do not always support superior results when compared to Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone (Barbosa et al 2009; Flury et al 2017; Herderschee et al 2013)

  • The majority of available home biofeedback devices for PFMT employ these measures to approximate PFM contraction strength with newer devices paired with a smartphone application

  • While the ring component is useful for device retention, an extension that is at least one-half the length of the vagina improves the detection of lift of the PFM during training

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common female pelvic floor disorder, experienced by an estimated 51% of women in the U.S (Markland et al 2011). Long-term adherence to PFMT regimens is essential for best results, and poor adherence to exercise regimens is often a barrier to resolution of symptoms (Bo and Hilde 2013). Biofeedback tools, such as surface electromyography (sEMG) and pressure perineometry serve as proxies to estimate PFM contraction, though validity of such tools remains questionable, and large-scale analyses do not always support superior results when compared to PFMT alone (Barbosa et al 2009; Flury et al 2017; Herderschee et al 2013). The majority of available home biofeedback devices for PFMT employ these measures to approximate PFM contraction strength with newer devices paired with a smartphone application

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call