Abstract

A constant minimum airflow rate is used in conventional Single Duct Variable Air Volume Terminal Box control sequences. This control sequence can cause occupant discomfort or use excessive energy under partial load conditions. If the minimum airflow rate is higher than required; terminal boxes will have significantly more simultaneous heating and cooling; and AHUs will consume more fan power. Buildings will have indoor air quality problems if the minimum airflow rate is less than required. Many engineers and researchers have investigated advanced variable air volume terminal box control algorithms without a system retrofit for thermal comfort; indoor air quality and energy savings. In this study a developed control system with variable minimum airflow rate for Single Duct Variable Air Volume Terminal Boxes was applied and validated using an actual building and evaluated for comfort; indoor air quality and energy consumption. The energy consumption and thermal performance of terminal boxes using the conventional and proposed control algorithms were compared.

Highlights

  • Single duct variable air volume (VAV) air-handling units (AHUs) are the most popular system in the USA

  • The objective of this study is to develop s terminal control system with the variable minimum airflow rate of Single Duct VAV Terminal Boxes and apply and validate it with an actual building and evaluate it for comfort, indoor air quality (IAQ) and energy consumption performance

  • In 1989, the ventilation rates established by ASHRAE Standard 62-1989 [11] increased substantially over those previously required by the 1981 version of the standard

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single duct variable air volume (VAV) air-handling units (AHUs) are the most popular system in the USA. Terminal boxes are a critical component in VAV systems. The minimum airflow rate of terminal boxes is a key factor for user comfort, indoor air quality (IAQ) and energy costs. A constant minimum airflow rate is used in conventional control sequences. This control sequence can cause occupant discomfort or use excessive energy. If the minimum airflow conditions are not optimal in terms of energy efficiency, terminal boxes will have significantly more simultaneous heating and cooling cycles and AHUs will consume more fan power. Buildings will have IAQ problems if the minimum airflow rate is less than required

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.