Abstract

Additive manufacturing technologies are essential in biomedical modeling and prototyping. Polymer-based bone models are widely used in simulating surgical interventions and procedures. Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures, in which the Kirschner wire fixation is the most widely used operative method. However, there is still lingering controversy throughout the published literature regarding the number of wires and sites of insertion. This study aims to critically compare the biomechanical stability of different K-wire fixation techniques. Different osteosyntheses were reconstructed on 189 novel standardized bone models, which were created using 3D printing and molding techniques, using PLA and polyurethane materials, and it has been characterized in terms of mechanical behavior and structure. X-ray imaging has also been performed. The validation of the model was successful: the relative standard deviations (RSD = 100 × SD × mean−1, where RSD is relative standard deviation, SD is the standard deviation) of the mechanical parameters varied between 1.1% (10° torsion; 6.52 Nm ± 0.07 Nm) and 5.3% (5° torsion; 4.33 Nm ± 0.23 Nm). The simulated fractures were fixed using two K-wires inserted from radial and dorsal directions (crossed wire fixation) or both from the radial direction, in parallel (parallel wire fixation). Single-wire fixations with shifted exit points were also included. Additionally, three-point bending tests with dorsal and radial load and torsion tests were performed. We measured the maximum force required for a 5 mm displacement of the probe under dorsal and radial loads (means for crossed wire fixation: 249.5 N and 355.9 N; parallel wire fixation: 246.4 N and 308.3 N; single wire fixation: 115.9 N and 166.5 N). We also measured the torque required for 5° and 10° torsion (which varied between 0.15 Nm for 5° and 0.36 Nm for 10° torsion). The crossed wire fixation provided the most stability during the three-point bending tests. Against torsion, both the crossed and parallel wire fixation were superior to the single-wire fixations. The 3D printed model is found to be a reliable, cost-effective tool that can be used to characterize the different fixation methods, and it can be used in further pre-clinical investigations.

Highlights

  • Forearm fractures are the most common fractures among the pediatric population, accounting for more than 40% of all childhood fractures [1,2]

  • The goal of this study is to reveal a standardized, cost-effective bone model, which can be produced with widely available fabrication processes and materials, such as polylactic acid (PLA)-based fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing

  • Using PLA and polyurethane can potentially be used for mimicking bones for critically evaluating surgical interventions since they can provide a reliable, standardized, and cost-effective method, which can be translated for other clinical simulations as well

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forearm fractures are the most common fractures among the pediatric population, accounting for more than 40% of all childhood fractures [1,2]. The distal radius is the predominant location of these fractures, constituting 80% of all pediatric forearm fractures [3]. Fracture management aims to ensure sufficient reduction and stability. These injuries are conservatively managed by closed reduction and cast immobilization [4,5]. In the case of unstable fractures, or when conservative treatment fails to achieve adequate reduction, surgical intervention is necessary. Wendling-Keim et al stated in cases with repeated reduction maneuvers, re-displacement is avoidable through primary percutaneous pinning [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call