Abstract
A quantitative HHV-6 PCR (qPCR) assay was developed and compared to an "in-house" qualitative PCR and to the commercial quantitative Argene CMV, HHV6, 7, 8 R-gene™ test. Clinical specimens consisting of 127 whole blood and 57 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were tested using the two qPCRs and the qualitative PCR in parallel. When the qualitative PCR was used as a "gold standard," the sensitivities of the qPCRs for the blood samples were 86% for the "in-house" qPCR and 76% for the Argene's test and the specificities were 96% and 92%, respectively. With CSF specimens the sensitivities were 92% and 80% and the specificities 98% and 82%, respectively. Furthermore, the two qPCRs were compared in the monitoring of liver transplant patients and retrospectively correlated to HHV-6 antigenaemia. In total, 223 blood specimens were tested. HHV-6 antigenaemia had been found in 21/36 (58%) patients and HHV-6 DNAaemia was demonstrated in 18/36 (50%). Viral loads by the "in-house" test varied from 280 to 19700 copies/ml (median 1200) and by Argene's test from 120 to 24070 copies/ml (median 458). The correlation of viral loads between the two qPCRs was good (R=0.94, p<0.01). The new in-house test was found to be reliable for the detection and quantitation of HHV-6 DNA in clinical specimens.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
