Abstract

The previous Korean liver allocation system was based on Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores, but increasing numbers of deceased donors created a pressing need to develop an equitable, objective allocation system based on model for end-stage liver disease scores (MELD scores). A nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of candidates registered for liver transplantation from January 2009 to December 2011 was conducted at 11 transplant centers. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to stratify MELD score ranges according to waitlist survival. Of the 2702 patients that registered for liver transplantation, 2248 chronic liver disease patients were eligible. CART analysis indicated several MELD scores significantly predicted waitlist survival. The 90-day waitlist survival rates of patients with MELD scores of 31–40, 21–30, and ≤20 were 16.2%, 64.1%, and 95.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the 14-day waitlist survival rates of severely ill patients (MELD 31–40, n = 240) with MELD scores of 31–37 (n = 140) and 38–40 (n = 100) were 64% and 43.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). Among patients with MELD > 20, presence of HCC did not affect waitlist survival (P = 0.405). Considering the lack of donor organs and geographic disparities in Korea, we proposed the use of a national broader sharing of liver for the sickest patients (MELD ≥ 38) to reduce waitlist mortality. HCC patients with MELD ≤ 20 need additional MELD points to allow them equitable access to transplantation. Based on these results, the Korean Network for Organ Sharing implemented the MELD allocation system in 2016.

Highlights

  • The adoption of a MELD score-based system does not ensure equitable organ distribution[9]

  • LDLT accounts for the major proportion of liver transplantations conducted in Korea, and in 2015 the living donation rate was 18.73 per million population (PMP)

  • In 2015, DDLT accounted for 32.6% of liver transplantation cases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The adoption of a MELD score-based system does not ensure equitable organ distribution[9]. MELD score-based systems have been continuously modified to enhance equity and efficiency[4,10,11]. The etiologies of liver diseases, medical environments, proportion of HCC, and donation rates are quite different in Asia and Western countries[5]. Few studies have evaluated the feasibility of a MELD based allocation system in Korea[7]. This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of a MELD score-based allocation system using nationwide data. We sought to develop the Korean liver allocation system

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.