Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidences of sustainable clinical benefits of bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) using osseointegrated fixation over typical socket-suspended prostheses are becoming more probing. This influx of individuals to be fitted with BAP has pressed government organisations to adjust their policies. However, the appraisal of consumer’s experience for the provision of BAP founded by government organisation is yet to be developed. This descriptive study shares the experience gained by a government organisation, namely the Queensland Artificial Limb Service (QALS), while developing a specific BAP-inclusive continuous quality improvement (CQI) procedure.
 OBJECTIVE(S): The primary objective was to present the methods and outcomes of key steps required to plan and create this CQI procedure. The secondary objective was to highlight key barriers and facilitators of the transition from a socket-focused to the proposed BAP-inclusive CQI procedure. 
 METHODOLOGY: The re-design process of the CQI procedure for 65 current QALS’s consumers with BAP involved a two-step process for the planning (e.g., case-mix, stakeholder) and creation (e.g., diagnosis, technical options, cost).
 FINDINGS: Prosthetists labour toward CQI procedure represented 1.3 hrs out of 22 hrs and AUD$213 out of AUD$3,300 or 6% of the whole procedure for the provision of BAP. The time spent by a prosthetist, consumer and QALS staff represented 24%, 24% and 53% of the time of the CQI procedure, respectively. The cost of prosthetist and QALS staff labour represented 70% and 30% of the CQI procedure, respectively.
 CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study shares the workings and methodology that government organisations, such as QALS, can use to re-design a CQI procedure for comprehensive appraisal of the provision of prosthesis that could be inclusive of BAP and affordable while minimally time-consuming for prosthetists. The transition from a socket-focused to the proposed minimally disruptive BAP-inclusive CQI procedure was facilitated by prior knowledge of BAP treatment, early identification of the stakeholders and adaptation of current CQI procedure.
 Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/31326/24425
 LAYMAN’S ABSTRACT
 There is evidence supporting the long term clinical benefits of bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) using an osseointegrated fixation over typical socket-suspended prostheses. The increasing number of individuals treated with osseointegrated fixation has pressed government organisations to adjust their policies for fair and equitable provision of prosthetic care. However, the appraisal of consumer’s experience for the provision of BAP by government organisation is yet to be developed. This descriptive study has fulfilled this need by sharing the experience gained by a QALS while developing a specific BAP-inclusive continuous quality improvement (CQI) procedure. This study revealed that government organisations can design a CQI procedure for comprehensive appraisal of the provision of prosthesis that could be inclusive of BAP and affordable while minimally time-consuming for prosthetists. The transition from a socket-focused to the proposed minimally disruptive BAP-inclusive CQI procedure was facilitated by prior knowledge of BAP treatment, early identification of the stakeholders and adaptation of current CQI procedure.
 How to Cite: Frossard L, Ferrada L, Quincey T, Burkett B, Berg D. Development of a government continuous quality improvement procedure for assessing the provision of bone anchored limb prosthesis: a process re-design descriptive study. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, No 4, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.31326

Highlights

  • The cost of prosthetist and Queensland Artificial Limb Service (QALS) staff labour represented 70% and 30% of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) procedure, respectively. This descriptive study shares the workings and methodology that government organisations, such as QALS, can use to re-design a CQI procedure for comprehensive appraisal of the provision of prosthesis that could be inclusive of bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) and affordable while minimally time-consuming for prosthetists

  • Strong demand for bone-anchored prostheses Evidences of sustainable clinical benefits of boneanchored prosthesis (BAP) using osseointegrated fixation over typical socket-suspended prostheses (SSP) are becoming more probing, for young and active individuals with non-vascular transfemoral amputation.[1,2,3,4] Clinical risks with BAP infection and breakage of components are currently deemed acceptable yet to be resolved satisfactorily.[5,6,7,8] Significant improvement in health-related quality of life has driven a steady demand from wide range of individuals with lower limb amputation.[1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] surgical procedures are growing at an unprecedented pace worldwide.[18, 27, 28]

  • Health services delivery of bone-anchored prosthesis. This influx of individuals fitted with osseointegrated fixation has pressed government organisations, like the Queensland Artificial Limb Service (QALS), to adjust their policies for fair and equitable provision of BAP.[18, 29] QALS established such procedure allowing financial assistance for consumers choosing BAP that involves seven processes costing AUD$3,300 for 22 hrs of labour per patient during the treatment.[29] cost cross-comparing and cost-effectiveness demonstrated health economic benefits of BAP over SSP from government perspective.[30,31,32] For instance, provision of BAP costed 21±41% more but increased quality-adjusted life-year by 17±5% compared to SSP leading to an indicative incremental cost effectiveness ratio of approximately AUD $17,000 per quality-adjusted life-year

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Strong demand for bone-anchored prostheses Evidences of sustainable clinical benefits of boneanchored prosthesis (BAP) using osseointegrated fixation over typical socket-suspended prostheses (SSP) are becoming more probing, for young and active individuals with non-vascular transfemoral amputation.[1,2,3,4] Clinical risks with BAP infection and breakage of components are currently deemed acceptable yet to be resolved satisfactorily.[5,6,7,8] Significant improvement in health-related quality of life has driven a steady demand from wide range of individuals with lower limb amputation.[1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] surgical procedures are growing at an unprecedented pace worldwide.[18, 27, 28]Health services delivery of bone-anchored prosthesisThis influx of individuals fitted with osseointegrated fixation has pressed government organisations, like the Queensland Artificial Limb Service (QALS), to adjust their policies for fair and equitable provision of BAP.[18, 29] QALS established such procedure allowing financial assistance for consumers choosing BAP that involves seven processes costing AUD$3,300 for 22 hrs of labour per patient during the treatment.[29]. Evidences of sustainable clinical benefits of bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) using osseointegrated fixation over typical socket-suspended prostheses are becoming more probing. This influx of individuals to be fitted with BAP has pressed government organisations to adjust their policies. The appraisal of consumer’s experience for the provision of BAP founded by government organisation is yet to be developed This descriptive study shares the experience gained by a government organisation, namely the Queensland Artificial Limb Service (QALS), while developing a specific BAP-inclusive continuous quality improvement (CQI) procedure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call