Development of a framework for action to advocate for a coherent prevention policy for tobacco, alcohol, and foods high in fats, salt, or sugar: a mixed-methods approach

Abstract

BackgroundTobacco, alcohol, and foods high in fats, salt, or sugar (HFSS) are health harming products. Limited progress in prevention is partly due to health-harming industry lobbying. Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Alcohol Health Alliance, and Obesity Health Alliance collaborated with the aim of developing a framework for action to address the saturation of these products in our environment. MethodsWe used a mixed-methods approach. Focus groups with academic experts, local government, and national government, recruited through snowball sampling were held in Nov 3, 2022 (14 participants); April 25, 2023 (20 participants); and June 15, 2023 (20 participants). Iteratively, data analysis was presented, and key themes tested. Commissioned economic analysis of national survey datasets quantified consumer spend on tobacco, alcohol, and food products above government recommendations (all tobacco use, >14 units of alcohol, and national dietary guidelines) and industry percentage of revenues (net of tax). Public opinion data from the ASH YouGov Smokefree Survey 2022 on a nationally representative sample of 13 088 adults were descriptively analysed for specific policy options. FindingsThe framework for action to achieve a coherent prevention approach across products included three key enablers (secure funding for prevention, a comprehensive strategy, and protecting health policy from industry interference). Five key actions were: regulate advertising to limit harm, regulate product use and environments they can be used in, promote healthy messaging, raise the price of health-harming products, and fund treatment services. Economic analysis identified 100% of tobacco usage, 43·4% of alcohol purchased, and 28·8% of food purchased by households was above government recommendations. Post-tax industry revenue was £7·3 billion for tobacco, £11·2 billion for alcohol, and £34·2 billion for HFSS foods. Strong public support for levies (5%, n=8495) and protecting health policy from industry influence (69%, n=9006) was apparent. InterpretationA coherent approach to prevention across health-harming products is effective and has public support. Strengths include the iterative process to develop the framework for action among focus groups and use of nationally representative datasets. Limitations include the snowball sampling. The findings were built into a strategy intended to inform future collaborative work in the area. FundingCancer Research UK (grant PICADV-Feb22\\100004).