Abstract

6103 Background: Studies assessing the quality of life (QoL) experienced by patients with MDS have almost universally relied upon generic measures; however, disease-specific QoL tools can allow for more sensitive assessments of the impact of changes in disease status. Methods: Using a clinical impact method of instrument development, individual and combined focus groups were conducted with 32 members of our institution’s MDS community (patients, their caregivers, and health care providers) to identify MDS-relevant QoL domains and associated question topics. Participants’ rankings of the importance of the domains and question topics were compared, collapsing patients/caregivers into one group and physicians/other providers into another. A draft scale was constructed taking a greater number of questions from the more highly-ranked domains. Results: “Fatigue” was ranked as the most important domain (see table). None of the 12 domains were ranked significantly differently by patients/caregivers versus providers. The two groups ranked 5 of 60 question topics differently: “Too tired for routine tasks” (providers higher; p= .05); “limited availability of support beyond the family” (providers higher; p= .02); “organizing life around transfusion/MD appointments” (providers higher, p= .03); “bruising” (patients/caregivers higher, p= .05) and “anger over diagnosis” (providers higher, p= .03). Conclusions: A high level of agreement in the rankings of domains and question topics between MDS patients/caregivers and providers suggests that the QoL experience of MDS patients is consistently compromised. The resulting 38-item draft QUALMS-1 tool is now being piloted (cognitive debriefing and behavioral coding) in a new cohort of MDS patients, with the ultimate goal of validation in a multi-institutional setting. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call