Abstract

The use of chemical kinetic mechanisms in computer aided engineering tools for internal combustion engine simulations is of high importance for studying and predicting pollutant formation of conventional and alternative fuels. However, usage of complex reaction schemes is accompanied by high computational cost in 0-D, 1-D and 3-D computational fluid dynamics frameworks. The present work aims to address this challenge and allow broader deployment of detailed chemistry-based simulations, such as in multi-objective engine optimization campaigns. A fast-running tabulated chemistry solver coupled to a 0-D probability density function-based approach for the modelling of compression and spark ignition engine combustion is proposed. A stochastic reactor engine model has been extended with a progress variable-based framework, allowing the use of pre-calculated auto-ignition tables instead of solving the chemical reactions on-the-fly. As a first validation step, the tabulated chemistry-based solver is assessed against the online chemistry solver under constant pressure reactor conditions. Secondly, performance and accuracy targets of the progress variable-based solver are verified using stochastic reactor models under compression and spark ignition engine conditions. Detailed multicomponent mechanisms comprising up to 475 species are employed in both the tabulated and online chemistry simulation campaigns. The proposed progress variable-based solver proved to be in good agreement with the detailed online chemistry one in terms of combustion performance as well as engine-out emission predictions (CO, CO2, NO and unburned hydrocarbons). Concerning computational performances, the newly proposed solver delivers remarkable speed-ups (up to four orders of magnitude) when compared to the online chemistry simulations. In turn, the new solver allows the stochastic reactor model to be computationally competitive with much lower order modeling approaches (i.e., Vibe-based models). It also makes the stochastic reactor model a feasible computer aided engineering framework of choice for multi-objective engine optimization campaigns.

Highlights

  • The ever-stringent regulations on carbon dioxide and criteria pollutants for internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), as well as the original equipment manufacturers (OEM) needing to reduce the technology development times, are among the key drivers of modern computer aided engineering (CAE) for engine development toolchains

  • The Stochastic Reactor Model (SRM) has been coupled with two different chemistry solvers: (1) online, where chemical source terms are calculated during run-time; (2) Combustion Progress Variable (CPV), which uses a pre-calculated look-up table to retrieve the source terms for combustion as well as thermal NO

  • Detailed comparisons by means of pressure, rate of heat release (RoHR) and crank angle resolved emissions for all the operating conditions listed in Table 2 can be found in Appendix A

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ever-stringent regulations on carbon dioxide and criteria pollutants (i.e., nitrogen oxides or particulate matter) for internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), as well as the original equipment manufacturers (OEM) needing to reduce the technology development times, are among the key drivers of modern computer aided engineering (CAE) for engine development toolchains. Sci. 2020, 10, 8979 study and optimize engine fuel efficiency and reduce pollutant formation, an experimentally driven campaign generally requires the deployment of expensive and highly complex techniques. The ever-increasing hardware complexities being introduced in modern powertrains (i.e., pre-chamber or advanced multi-stage aftertreatment) make the experimental engine development process even more challenging. Each new technology introduces a new degree of freedom in the parameter range of a combustion engine development. In this scenario, numerical methods represent an attractive tool to aid the engine development process, more so if they are capable of accounting for both the chemical and physical phenomena occurring in an internal combustion engine-based powertrain

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.