Abstract

e17509 Background: Genomic profiling has strongly impacted the contemporary understanding of prostate cancer (PCa). Clinical trials are now testing the utility of genomic classifiers such as the PCS (You, Ca Res 2016) and PAM50 (Zhao, JAMA Onc 2017) systems to optimize therapy selection. As contemporary tissue is not always readily available, especially in metastatic, castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), a blood-based test would be better suited for assessing patients and predicting treatment response. Methods: The CTC-RNA assay combines the Thermoresponsive (TR)-NanoVelcro system with the NanoString nCounter platform. This allows for CTC purification and RNA analysis. Using a novel bioinformatics approach that accounts for differences in background signals between tissue and blood, we reconstructed the PCS and PAM50 panels to recapitulate both classifiers in this blood-based assay. A weighted Z-score and nearest centroid classifier were used to calculate gene expression and to assign PCS and PAM50 subtypes. Performance of the revised signatures and CTC-RNA assay was benchmarked on simulated spiked-blood specimens. An initial clinical test was performed using clinically annotated, banked blood specimens within the Translational Oncology Program Blood and Biospecimen Bank. Results: CTC-RNA profiles of C4-2B AR signaling inhibitor (ARSI)-resistant sublines were compared to parental C4-2B. C4-2B ARSI-resistant cells had significantly higher PCS1 Z scores, PCS1 probability, and basal probability compared to the parental C4-2B cells. Blood samples from 34 mCRPC patients prior to initiation of therapy with ARSIs (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide) were then analyzed. Samples were classified as PCS1 (n = 3), PCS2 (n = 20), and PCS3 (n = 11); luminal A (n = 12), luminal B (n = 11), and basal (n = 11). The biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) on ARSI and overall survival (OS) for PCS1/Basal vs. other are shown in the table. Conclusions: The CTC-RNA assay is capable of generating luminal-basal classifications such as those in the PCS and PAM50 systems. Given early data of these classifiers and their potential to guide therapeutic decisions, this approach may be useful as an alternative to biopsy to facilitate such decisions. Larger prospective studies will be needed to confirm and validate its clinical utility. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call