Abstract

The purpose of the current study was twofold: 1) to develop a new BMI-based body fat equation that includes the measurement of RHG (BMINICKERSON) and 2) to cross-validate BMINICKERSON, BMIWOMERSLEY, BMIJACKSON, BMIDEURENBERG, and BMIGALLAGHER against a four-compartment criterion. The development and cross-validation samples consisted of 230 and 110 participants, respectively. Criterion body fat percent was determined with a four-compartment model. RHG was calculated by summing the max of each handgrip strength measurement and dividing by body mass. BMI (kg·m), RHG (kg·kg), age (yr), ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic White), and sex (male or female) were entered into a stepwise regression to calculate BMINICKERSON. BMINICKERSON was calculated as follows: body fat percent = 21.504 - (12.484 × RHG) - (7.998 × sex) + (0.722 × BMI). In the cross-validation sample, BMINICKERSON produced lower constant error (CE) and total error (TE) values (CE = -0.11%, TE = 4.28%) than all other BMI-based body fat equations (CE = 0.89%-1.90%, TE = 5.71%-6.87%). Furthermore, the 95% limits of agreement were lower for BMINICKERSON ± 8.47% than previous BMI-based body fat equations (95% limits of agreement = ±11.14% to 13.33%). Current study results confirm that previous BMI-based body fat equations produce large error in Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites but can be improved by accounting for RHG. Allied health professionals are encouraged to use BMINICKERSON in clinical and field settings for adiposity assessments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call