Abstract

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) and other state agencies are continuously looking for techniques to reduce roadway maintenance and construction costs. A common consideration is to introduce asphalt mixtures with a smaller nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) for utilization in roadways. In a previous study, DOTD concluded that mixtures with a 4.75 mm NMAS provided acceptable performance as a surface layer. Excessive stockpiles of unused smaller aggregates can result in an economically competitive source to be consi dered for asphalt mixtures. The DOTD developed mixtures with four aggregate types and two binder types. A comprehensive evaluation of performance was conducted through volumetric and mechanistic testing. Performance testing consisted of the Loaded Wheel Tracking (LWT) test to determine rutting resistance, Semi-Circular Bend (SCB) test to evaluate intermediate temperature cracking resistance, and dynamic modulus (E*) to ascertain the stiffness at intermediate temperatures. As expected, asphalt binder grade, aggregate type and mixture composition affected the performance of mixtures evaluated. Gravel mixtures were susceptible to cracking, while limestone mixtures were susceptible to rutting. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the viability of 4.75 mm mixtures. The cost per ton of 4.75 mm mixtures in Louisiana was higher than conventional 12.5 mm mixtures. However, when considering the lift thickness of potential overlays, the 4.75 mm aggregate mixtures became more viable. Further, a life-cycle analysis of a designed pavement using AASHTO Pavement-ME was performed to compare the lifetime durability of the 4.75 mm NMAS mixtures to a conventional 12.5 mm mixture.

Highlights

  • IntroductionState agencies and research labs have shown smaller nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) mixtures, 4.75 mm, have several benefits over larger NMAS mixtures

  • Introduction and backgroundThe Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) is facing budget constraints due to lack of funding

  • This study aims to evaluate the economic viability of the recently developed mixture design criteria for 4.75 mm nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) mixtures to be used in Louisiana

Read more

Summary

Introduction

State agencies and research labs have shown smaller NMAS mixtures, 4.75 mm, have several benefits over larger NMAS mixtures These benefits include a reduction in screening stockpiles, use in thin lift applications, use in leveling and patching applications, and use in low volume road applications [6,7,8]. Williams [8] compared 4.75 mm mixtures to 12.5 mm mixtures using two-wheel tracker tests and confirmed the same phenomenon Based on their studies, it was understood that 4.75 mm mixtures could be designed to resist rutting and stripping similar, and sometimes improved, when compared to 12.5 mm mixtures. Superpave specifications added a 4.75 mm NMAS designation and criteria section based on the work done by Cooley Jr. et al

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call