Abstract

Graphite–copper (Gr–Cu) and graphite–aluminum (Gr–Al) composites are potential candidates for enhanced thermal management for different engineering applications. However, their applications are limited by inadequate thermal conductivity, high coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and low microhardness. In this study, SiC and ZrB2 were incorporated into Gr–Cu and Gr–Al powders, and then sintered in a spark plasma sintering (SPS) system to produce Gr–Cu + 8wt%SiC, Gr–Cu + 4wt%SiC + 4wt%ZrB2, Gr–Al + 8wt%SiC and Gr–Al + 4wt%SiC + 4wt%ZrB2 composites. After sintering, the physical, morphological, thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of the composites were evaluated. Results indicated 8.5% increase in relative density for reinforced Gr–Cu composites over the unreinforced Gr–Cu. The porosity of the reinforced Gr–Cu composites is 40.5% lower than that of the unreinforced and ~ 8% for reinforced Gr–Al. For all the sintered samples, Gr–Cu + 4wt%SiC + 4wt%ZrB2 sample has the highest hardness value of 44.5 HV0.1, highest peak intensity ratio of 80.19% and minimum CTE of 2.02 × 10–5/K. The huge increase in the microhardness and peak intensity ratio of Gr–Cu + 4wt%SiC + 4wt%ZrB2 is partially attributed to the formation of hard ZrC phase and three-bond system in ZrB2. This composite is recommended for thermal management of heat sinks and heat spreaders in electronics and pistons in automobiles.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.