Abstract

Mycobacterial culture remains the gold standard for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in clinical samples. However, no external quality assessment (EQA) tools exist to validate results obtained using this sophisticated method. Therefore, we developed EQA panels to assess the quality of mycobacterial culture results produced by designated TB hospitals in China. Artificial sputum containing methylcellulose was used to supplement quantified mycobacterial solutions to simulate culture-negative and culture-positive clinical sputum samples of low or high mycobacterial concentration, respectively. After storage of the quantified simulated EQA panels for 4weeks at 4°C, experimental bacterial quantification of the panels was again conducted, with no impact of artificial sputum on mycobacterial culture results observed. Next, 47 tuberculosis (TB) hospitals were recruited for evaluation of the EQA panels. Overall, 29 hospitals (61.7%) produced mycobacterial culture test results matching expected results for the EQA panels, while the remaining 18 (38.3%) hospitals did not. False-negative results for the low mycobacterial concentration panel sample accounted for 33 (73.3%) diagnostic errors. Compared with hospitals using solid culture methods as a control group, hospitals using the liquid culture method were less likely to produce uncertified results (aOR 0.064, 95% CI 0.005-0.770). In conclusion, we first developed then evaluated EQA panels for validation of mycobacterial culture testing in China. Our data demonstrate that approximately one-third of TB hospitals failed to produce results that met criteria for classification as certified mycobacterial culture testing providers, emphasizing the importance of quality control and quality assurance in TB diagnostics.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call